Gillian and Katja open episode 83 with a genuinely funny funeral story before landing on two topics sent in by listeners: China’s new tariff on Australian beef, and fresh University of Adelaide research on why some farm women flinch at the word “farmer.” As ever, the chit-chat is the entree and the opinions are the main course.
#83 | Farm Wives, Tariffs, and Bull Sales: Chit Chat with Katja and Gillian – Agsolutely Fabulous
Katja’s turning the family bull sale into a podcast, and it’s smart
Before the serious topics, Katja shares that she’s talked her husband Ned into recording a mini-series ahead of Poldale’s on-property Shorthorn bull sale on Wednesday 26 August, covering family history, what makes a good bull, and the tension between trusting predicted breeding data versus the old stockman’s eye. It’s a genuinely clever piece of content marketing dressed up as a family archive project, and Gillian’s right that it’ll be worth more to Katja’s kids in twenty years than any sale catalogue ever could be.
China’s 55% tariff: not sabotage, just a quota
The headline story sent in by an AgFab was China’s decision to slap an additional 55% tariff on Australian beef, and Gillian’s read on it lines up with what actually happened. China introduced a three-year beef safeguard system in January 2026, setting import quotas for major exporters including Australia, Brazil, Argentina, New Zealand, Uruguay and the United States, explicitly to protect its own domestic beef producers from being undercut. Australia’s quota for the year was set at 205,000 tonnes. That ceiling was reached on 16 June 2026, triggering the additional 55% tariff on top of existing duties from 20 June. For context on scale, Australia exported more than 295,000 tonnes of beef to China in the first eleven months of 2025 alone, so this quota represents a real and deliberate cut to what had been a rapidly growing trade relationship, not a random act of economic aggression.
The real story behind the headline
Gillian’s broader point here is the one worth remembering next time a China trade story breaks: hitting the quota this fast is proof of demand, not decline. Chinese buyers moved early because they wanted the product before the tariff kicked in, which is exactly what a rational market does when a known deadline is coming. It’s a far less dramatic explanation than the “China turning on Australia” framing that shows up in some coverage, and it’s consistent with China running the same safeguard mechanism against Brazil, Argentina and the US, not singling Australia out.
Do you call yourself a farmer? The University of Adelaide wants to know
The second topic is new research out of the University of Adelaide, led by researcher Emily Buttle, looking at women working in farm businesses who feel uncomfortable claiming the label “farmer” and the alternative terms they reach for instead. Worth flagging plainly: neither host had actually read the paper by the time of recording, it sits behind a paywall, and Gillian’s account of its contents is secondhand from a friend who worked on it rather than a direct citation. Treat the specifics as a preview of academic work in progress rather than settled findings, the same way Gillian and Katja do, while the underlying question, why the identity label carries so much weight for farm women specifically, is one this podcast keeps returning to for good reason.
Labels are none of your business, actually
Where this episode lands is the most quotable part: call yourself whatever reflects how you see your own contribution, farmer, farm wife, farmer’s wife, and don’t get precious about what anyone else chooses to call themselves either. Gillian’s framing of feminism as the right to self-identify and not be boxed in by other people’s expectations, rather than a mandate to reject any label that sounds traditional, is a useful reset for a debate that gets heated online for reasons that usually have nothing to do with the actual work being done on the actual farm.
Leave a comment